The team at the Georgia Institute of Technology built a solid state battery and used X-ray computed tomography (CT) to visualize in real time how cracks form near the edges of the interfaces of the materials.
“Solid state batteries could be safer than lithium-ion batteries and potentially hold more energy, which would be ideal for electric vehicles and even electric aircraft,” said Matthew McDowell, an assistant professor in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering and the School of Materials Science and Engineering. “Technologically, it’s a very fast moving field, and there are a lot of companies interested in this.”
Solving the fracturing problem could be one of the first steps to unlocking the potential of solid state batteries, including their high energy density. The deterioration observed is likely to affect other types of solid state battery, the researchers noted, so the findings could lead to the design of more durable interfaces.
For the project, the research team built a solid-state battery in which a solid ceramic disc was sandwiched between two pieces of solid lithium. The ceramic disc replaced the typical liquid electrolyte. “Figuring out how to make these solid pieces fit together and behave well over long periods of time is the challenge,” said McDowell. “We’re working on how to engineer these interfaces between these solid pieces to make them last as long as possible.”
Working with an expert in X-ray imaging, Christopher Saldana, the researchers placed the solid state battery under an X-ray microscope and charged and discharged it, looking for physical changes indicative of degradation. Slowly over the course of several days, a web-like pattern of cracks formed throughout the disc. Those cracks are the problem and occur alongside the growth of an interphase layer between the lithium metal and solid electrolyte. The researchers found that this fracture during cycling causes resistance to the flow of ions.
“These are unwanted chemical reactions that occur at the interfaces,” said McDowell. “People have generally assumed that these chemical reactions are the cause the degradation of the cell. But what we learned by doing this imaging is that in this particular material, it’s not the chemical reactions themselves that are bad – they don’t affect the performance of the battery. What’s bad is that the cell fractures, and that destroys the performance of the cell.
- IMEC DOUBLES ENERGY DENSITY OF SOLID STATE BATTERIES
- FORD BACKS ROLL-TO-ROLL SOLID STATE BATTERIES
- CARBON NANOTUBES BREAKTHROUGH DOUBLES ENERGY DENSITY OF BATTERIES
- SOLID STATE BATTERIES FOR MEDICAL IMPLANTS